few weeks ago in my post titled "Any dumb Quebec," I was a little aside on the former CEO of Hydro Quebec, André Caillé, who hoped to run in provincial politics, possibly the colors of the ADQ.
I learn this week that nice gentleman looking for a "home for his ideas." According to the text of the Press,
"André Caillé, former CEO of Hydro-Quebec, burning to make the leap into politics, but said Thursday it had not yet found a party Provincial opened his controversial ideas on electricity rates and welfare. "
Listen to what he said about welfare:
" I must be really right, because for me , social welfare, it must be targeted and it should be transparent, he said. It can not be universal and forever. Should it be focused, transparent and temporary. It will not work, our business. It will explode, that system. This is not true that we will be able to maintain the balance of public finances, not even in the medium term, if we are not able to say that. "
I throw flowers today to all heads of parties that have lifted the nose of André Caillé. For once, they showed flair. Rejection of an application not very profitable.
On the issue of welfare, André Caillé in ignorance is the most pathetic. End of story. It is thought the parrot easy, plug in a box, a supporter of the object before humans. Lack of Judgement? Unfortunate.
focused, transparent and temporary .
If Mr. Curd was ever so little concern for consistency, it would read the statistics on welfare instead of reading texts Opinion Fraser institute to get an idea, instead of taking cash for some monologues Patrick Huard (man I love going and with whom I share offline experience unique).
The duration of stay on welfare is proportional to the age of the claimant's educational background and professional experience. Young people spend an average of 3 months using; persons aged 45 and over are virtually doomed for lack of a high school diploma and a willingness to hire the labor market. There's a million people in Quebec who can neither read nor write. They are found where, according to him?
must in any case that Mr. Caillé eventually include a couple of tricks. First, in politics, if our side is not up to the electorate (I try to imagine the number of joints to make him smoke to draw a sincere smile), it must be revolutionary and brilliant ideas. Second, we must behave as a future citizen representative, not contemptuous Bogeyman who takes his ideas in a chapter of a cheap version of the Old Testament, Genesis kind. Not surprising that his ideas are on the streets. I do not even give them $ 100 per month. If comparing those his ideas on welfare, I understand he wants to put the ax in the system.
And thirdly, if we learned that me, as manager of a bar, I go every night, leaving the doors unlocked without activating the alarm system for ten years, despite the recommendations of Experts, not only I would dismiss, but I do give back more responsibility for one kind of nasty end. Not to mention references to forget. What
Master curd sheet perched on the tree of peace to Quebecers. Let him go and produce a reality show by putting himself on welfare for a couple of years, just to see. Him or anyone. Because of us, if we look at the sequence and severity of errors that ended his career at Hydro, anyone middle class would have had to beg knees a job misery. No, Môssieur and friends, it does not work like that.
top, as you're bad, you go with ten years' salary, a doctorate Honoris Causa and better job awaits you at the door when you leave your boxes.
You know, this is not what really bothers me. Me, what makes straightening my hair frizzy, and know that it is a very unpleasant experience in itself-is when one of these individuals in the high comes to lecture the lowest strata of human society.
"Why do not you try Walking in Our Shoes or just shut the f. .. up? ," do I want to say on behalf of the fifty silent will die of hunger and cold our streets this winter?
You have not tired of all those who give lessons to $ 2,000 and more time jumping from mega-mega-job by job, they have been dismissed, not renewed, whatever, that if they were ordinary or rotten? Of those who, unless they end up in prison, live their entire lives in paradise, we are the moral and ask us to continually tighten the belt?
The world upside down, I tell you.
ADDITION: Wednesday morning ...
I just learned that Mr. Caillé would run for the partial Bourget. Hmm, should I consider putting my candidacy for the nomination PQ length a history of disparaging these characters hit a wall, especially in this riding away from the title of richest Montreal? Dear readers, I trust your intuition.